Pretty cool video on how astronauts drink coffee in space:
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
relishing in pain
What the heck is wrong with people? Do you notice that sometimes people take pleasure in the misfortune of others? Are people hard-wired this way? Is it something that we're brought up with?
I know this sounds awfully cynical, but think about it. Remember when you were a kid, watching cartoons and all that stuff? Think back...Yogi Bear, Coyote and Roadrunner, Sylvester and Speedy Gonzales...the funniest moments where when Yogi failed to get a basket, or coyote blew himself up or fell off a cliff, or when Sylvester gets smoked trying to chase Speedy.
Even on TV these days, we see that the funniest plotlines are when the main character is failing miserably or about to fail. Take Frasier for example. In that show, for seven seasons Niles has been madly in love with Daphne, but has seen missed-opportunities and epic failures come in the way of asking her o
ut. In Cheers, the recurring Bar Wars between Cheers and Gary's Old Towne Tavern has Cheers losing or screwing themselves up each time. Why is that?
ut. In Cheers, the recurring Bar Wars between Cheers and Gary's Old Towne Tavern has Cheers losing or screwing themselves up each time. Why is that?Frustration is funnier than victory. It wouldn't be funny if Yogi got the basket right off the bat, or if Coyote and Sylvester ate their respective counterparts. The entertainment is built upon their knack for failure and ensuing frustration. Is that twisted that we find this funny? I supposed now that we've somewhat established that people are kinda screwed up, is it something we can change? I'm definitely not saying I have the solution, I'm just posing the question. Please let me know what you think.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
youth group kid's question
So a few weeks ago I went on a camping trip with the youth group from church, and one of the kids asked the most random question: do you think we spend too much money fund
ing NASA and wouldn't that money be put to better use elsewhere such as feeding people here in our country? I looked at Paul and Gideon, the two that were with me at the time and we had no clue where the question came from. I tried to explain why we fund NASA and why it's important to our national priorities, and ended up pontificating for a good 15 minutes on how research that doesn't produce fruit now may be incredibly important one day, and we shouldn't let funding decide which issues get the most attention. After that, she was more confused than when she asked the question, and I looked more confused than her. So that got me to thinking, is it really worth it? Of course it is; and after some research and number crunching I finally have the backup.
The common misconception is that we spend a lot of money on NASA. True, the budget for NASA is $16.143 Billion (as of 2007); however please take that into perspective. The national budget that year was $2.784 trillion, which means NASA funding accounted for 0.58% of the national budget. Wow that's a whopper. We spend $1.581 trillion on social services in 2007 (the budgets for the Department of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Veterans Affairs, Social Security, Agriculture, and Labor). For every $1 we spend on NASA, we spend $98 on social services. If we cut social programs by 1% we could double the budget for NASA. Of course, the amount we spend on social services is really even more than the $1.581 trillion since that's only FEDERAL spending. If we were to add together the state and local governments' spending on social services, we could very nearly double that amount. Now I think it's fair to assume that state and local gov'ts aren't spending money on space exploration right?
Many people, including the youth group kid, believe that we should solve our problems here on earth before we try to conquer space. The reality of it is, even if we increased social services budget by 1% (the reality is, it could very well be less than the 1% when state and local govt spending is taken into account), do you really think that 1% will make a difference? Honestly, it's a drop in a bucket.
When we look at the benefits of space exploration, keep in mind the intangibles, the things that we gain that cannot be quantified. Space travel is inspirational, not only for children, but for adults as well. There is currently various forms of research done aboard the International Space Station as well as on all Shuttle missions. We haven't fully grasped the benefits of what space research has garnered, but that doesn't mean we should give it up. And at $17 billion a year, or 0.58% of the Federal budget, that's a steal.
ing NASA and wouldn't that money be put to better use elsewhere such as feeding people here in our country? I looked at Paul and Gideon, the two that were with me at the time and we had no clue where the question came from. I tried to explain why we fund NASA and why it's important to our national priorities, and ended up pontificating for a good 15 minutes on how research that doesn't produce fruit now may be incredibly important one day, and we shouldn't let funding decide which issues get the most attention. After that, she was more confused than when she asked the question, and I looked more confused than her. So that got me to thinking, is it really worth it? Of course it is; and after some research and number crunching I finally have the backup.
The common misconception is that we spend a lot of money on NASA. True, the budget for NASA is $16.143 Billion (as of 2007); however please take that into perspective. The national budget that year was $2.784 trillion, which means NASA funding accounted for 0.58% of the national budget. Wow that's a whopper. We spend $1.581 trillion on social services in 2007 (the budgets for the Department of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Veterans Affairs, Social Security, Agriculture, and Labor). For every $1 we spend on NASA, we spend $98 on social services. If we cut social programs by 1% we could double the budget for NASA. Of course, the amount we spend on social services is really even more than the $1.581 trillion since that's only FEDERAL spending. If we were to add together the state and local governments' spending on social services, we could very nearly double that amount. Now I think it's fair to assume that state and local gov'ts aren't spending money on space exploration right?Many people, including the youth group kid, believe that we should solve our problems here on earth before we try to conquer space. The reality of it is, even if we increased social services budget by 1% (the reality is, it could very well be less than the 1% when state and local govt spending is taken into account), do you really think that 1% will make a difference? Honestly, it's a drop in a bucket.
When we look at the benefits of space exploration, keep in mind the intangibles, the things that we gain that cannot be quantified. Space travel is inspirational, not only for children, but for adults as well. There is currently various forms of research done aboard the International Space Station as well as on all Shuttle missions. We haven't fully grasped the benefits of what space research has garnered, but that doesn't mean we should give it up. And at $17 billion a year, or 0.58% of the Federal budget, that's a steal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)