Today, even though it was my late day to show up to work, I woke up at 6 (not really sure why…). After my morning ablutions, I sat down to check my email when it suddenly hit me. I realized what a gift I had on my hands; 3 solid, beautiful, magnificent hours of free time. Oh baby. What the heck was I doing sitting in front of my computer checking email?? So, with that in mind, I dropped my friend off at his class and decided to make the most of the rest of my newly found free time. I mowed the lawn, set the sprinkler system (yes, in addition to growing long, my grass has also taken on a hint of yellow), and even cleaned the bathroom. Then, I sat down and started on my devos, which, to be truthful, has really lagged as of late.
This morning, my devos took me through the early part of Ephesians. While reading through the beginning of the passage, it really hit me just how much of a mess we are. We were dead in our transgressions and sin, following the ways of the world and gratifying the cravings of sinful nature. We were objects of wrath…yikes! The first three verses really hammer in just how lost, how far gone, how hopeless we are. We’re not just a little spiritually sick, or spiritually weak, but no, Paul says we’re dead. Death is a separation, so when we die, we’re separated from other people, permanently (duh). Likewise, spiritual death is a separation from God. It’s funny, when I think about my life, I don’t tend to think of it as steeped in sin or being a terrible mess (most of the time), but that’s exactly how it is, that’s exactly how it can be.
Then, in verse four, there’s a dramatic change, going from a gloomy outlook to something different, precipitated by the phrase “But God…” I was deserving of punishment from him, But God…I was disobedient to Him, But God… At these two words, the passage takes a dramatic turn: it is by grace you have been saved. This change then leads into the fact and realization that I can’t work my way into anything, but only and purely by the grace of God would I be able to saved. Only God can work my sinful soul into heaven. God has transformed me and allowed me to be able to be with Christ.
Two days ago I witnessed my friend get baptized, and as she went into the water and came back up, in my mind, the symbolism of that dramatic change took place. I know…she was a Christian already and the baptism is a public profession of belief, but to me, at that moment, God transformed her.
This passage ends with one of the most humbling and beautiful sentences I’ve ever read: For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do. Here, the word “workmanship” can mean product, project, or masterpiece. We are his workmanship, created and worked upon constantly at His pleasure. Makes me think sometimes…how can I just take that and run with it? How can I just live with that fact and not do anything about it?
"Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God…"
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Monday, May 17, 2010
The 2010 Census: Annuit Coeptis has hit a bit of a snag…
It’s 2010, the year of the decennial census. We all get letters in the mail asking us several probative questions, all with the intention of taking down information for statistical analysis. The federal government uses data collected every ten years for various purposes, including congressional seat allotment, education funding, etc. Censuses have been used since before the time of Christ to gauge the population changes in a certain region, and gather demographical information. At first glance, this may seem as a positive thing, something useful to have; however, is it really effective? Is a door-to-door headcount really the best way to gather information about the population of our country?
This year’s census will cost $11 Billion, which includes the marketing, mailing, and finally the door-to-door interviewing of the entire population of the US. This is more than half the annual budget of NASA, and 20% of our annual federal funding for education. It costs, on average, $57 for a census worker to visit a house. The process has been described as tedious, costly, and inaccurate in op-ed pieces in the Washington Post, NYT, Christian Science Monitor, and about a dozen other major metropolitan newspapers. A senior fellow at the Brookings Institute says that it would be a mistake for the census to be carried out without sampling. So why does the census not use statistical sampling?
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. (Article 1, Section 2)
At the time it was written, a door-to-door headcount was the only known way of counting the population. In today’s day and age, there is a general consensus that statistical sampling would greatly improve not only the accuracy of the census, but also carry only a fraction of the $11 billion price-tag that the current headcount has. The language of the constitution itself in this particular case is arcane. Adding the whole number of free persons and three fifths of all other persons. 3/5 of all other persons?? Clearly this passage was written in a time and matter that reflected the best thinking of it’s time. I think it’s fair to say that it’s time to update this with a more effective method. Well, how come we haven’t done so yet?
As it turns out, such an update of the constitution is extremely controversial due to the political nature of the change. The census generally overcounts kids that go off to college (whose parents may have counted them, in addition to their own census filing at school) and military servicemen serving away from home. In the same respect, the census has undercounted hard-to-reach minorities and homeless people in traditionally urban and other densely populated areas. These folks, were they to vote, would probably vote Democrat (a generalization). This would pose a long floor-fight to even bring such a measure to vote. Nevertheless, this is definitely a worthy cause to consider, as it would alleviate a great tax burden upon the population, as well as increasing the accuracy of the population statistics.
Ok…didn’t mean to put you folks through this whole long thing…but it’s one of those things that really annoy me. I appreciate that we should be getting statistical data about the population to decide how many seats a particular state gets or how much federal education funding each gets, but there are better ways of getting to that data. If only we could push aside the partisanship and get to a better place.
Saturday, May 15, 2010
50 beans | soy tax??
Since my mug broke on thursday, I was unable to make coffee yesterday morning. When Dan sent the coffee email at 9:30, I got all excited and replied with a hearty “ready!!” and proceeded to head downstairs to our lobby meeting point. As the coffee crew congregated we chatted about or lives and the weekend, walking to the Starbucks in the lobby at the same time.
As we shuffled in line for the next few minutes I had to decide what to get. It’s been a while since I’ve bought coffee (since I make it at home), so I thought I’d opt out of my regular Americano and get something different: Grande soy latte (don’t judge). $3.55 + 0.40. What the heck?? Soy’s 40 cents extra?? Ok, soymilk costs slightly more than 2% milk, lasts roughly 12-20 times longer in the fridge or out in an unopened container than milk (so stocking costs are lower), and come in smaller containers so it’s not like they will open a carton and not be able to use it all in one day. McDonalds doesn’t charge extra for ketchup, so why charge extra for soy? It’s not an addition, it’s a substitute.
For some people, getting soy in coffee is not a choice (i.e. me). I, for one, don’t like soy in my coffee, but because of certain circumstances against my will, I must use soy. This is a form of price discrimination, where people who want to be healthier, or simply can’t drink milk, are forced to cough up an extra 0.40 per cup so that they can enjoy what other people can get for no additional cost. I know this is a big stink to raise for 0.40, but this adds up to be quite a bit over the span of a year. They don’t charge extra for handicap bathrooms (I know…if it wasn’t the law…they probably would…) so why target us soy drinkers.
C’mon Starbucks…stop the soy tax.
As we shuffled in line for the next few minutes I had to decide what to get. It’s been a while since I’ve bought coffee (since I make it at home), so I thought I’d opt out of my regular Americano and get something different: Grande soy latte (don’t judge). $3.55 + 0.40. What the heck?? Soy’s 40 cents extra?? Ok, soymilk costs slightly more than 2% milk, lasts roughly 12-20 times longer in the fridge or out in an unopened container than milk (so stocking costs are lower), and come in smaller containers so it’s not like they will open a carton and not be able to use it all in one day. McDonalds doesn’t charge extra for ketchup, so why charge extra for soy? It’s not an addition, it’s a substitute.
For some people, getting soy in coffee is not a choice (i.e. me). I, for one, don’t like soy in my coffee, but because of certain circumstances against my will, I must use soy. This is a form of price discrimination, where people who want to be healthier, or simply can’t drink milk, are forced to cough up an extra 0.40 per cup so that they can enjoy what other people can get for no additional cost. I know this is a big stink to raise for 0.40, but this adds up to be quite a bit over the span of a year. They don’t charge extra for handicap bathrooms (I know…if it wasn’t the law…they probably would…) so why target us soy drinkers.
C’mon Starbucks…stop the soy tax.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
my mom
I fully intend to write something nice about my mom today…seeing as it’s mother’s day and all; however, for some reason I’m having the hardest time trying to find the right words to say. You know…I can’t think of anything that could possibly describe my mom better than the following:
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. (1 Corinthians 13:4-7)
Thanks for putting up with me all these years mom. Happy Mothers Day!
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. (1 Corinthians 13:4-7)
Thanks for putting up with me all these years mom. Happy Mothers Day!
Saturday, May 8, 2010
gotta love farmers (market)

It’s MAY!!



Monday, May 3, 2010
50 beans | a weekend ritual...
tsssstt...The nitrogen quickly escapes from the pressurized can of perfectly tanned medium roast coffee beans as I pull back on the sealed tab, releasing an aroma that rushes to fill the kitchen. As I count out the beans for my task, I slowly and purposefully take in the experience of the coffee through all five senses. From the coarse, slightly oily texture of each bean to the rich and fragrant aroma filling the air around the room, the feast for my senses is something that often leaves me breathless as I savor every moment.
As the filter holds the 7 grams of tamped grounds in place, 30ml of 194°F distilled water is forced through at 12 atmospheres of pressure, extracting more than simply colored water. The resulting brew is an aromatic experience, thick in consistency and carrying with it a buttery layer of crema, composed of rich oils, full bodied flavor, and really the essence of the bean. As the temperature drops down to 150°F, it’s time to enjoy the brew.
As I finish the cup to begin my day, I close the can of beans back up and put it in the freezer (I know it’s weird…but that’s where I’ve always kept coffee beans) until the next time I can take a few minutes to take pleasure in the joy that is coffee.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
falling rocks

A few weekends ago, on the way up to Stinson Beach, I saw a sign cautioning for falling rocks. This struck me as a bit unusual and kind of pointless. What exactly am I meant to do with that kind of information? It’s not like I can do anything about falling rocks. Even if I drive slower and more cautiously…would I be able to avoid rocks coming at me from above? They might as well just put up another sign saying: random accidents ahead, life’s a lottery, be lucky.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)